Why does compiled code pose more risk than interpreted code?

Compiled code does indeed pose more risk than interpreted code primarily due to the nature of how it is executed and the potential for malicious content. When code is compiled, it translates the high-level programming language into machine code that the computer's processor can execute directly. This final product can be manipulated by attackers who can embed malicious instructions within it. The compiled format can be more challenging to scrutinize for hidden threats because it often lacks the readability and transparency associated with the original source code.

Interpreted code, on the other hand, is executed line by line by an interpreter, providing a level of transparency that can make it easier to detect potentially harmful code. In this context, the inherent qualities of compiled code make it more susceptible to embedding threats that end-users might not recognize until it’s too late, leading to security vulnerabilities in systems.

The other options do not accurately capture the primary reason why compiled code carries more risk. While compiled code may have performance implications, it is not inherently slower or less stable. Testing compiled code can be effective, although it might present different challenges compared to interpreted code. Finally, reverse engineering is applicable to both types of code, but the absence of original source visibility in compiled code does indeed make it easier in some contexts, rather